Answer. 

1. Currently, MySQIF™ only operates on Microsoft Windows PCs. Other operating systems and devices are planned.
2. Click Sign Up. Enter your name, email address, and desired password. Then, enter your credit card payment information. Click Sign Up NOW!
3. Receive a Confirmation email from MySQIF™.
4. Click on Download the MySQIF™ Privacy App. The app ZIP package will be downloaded to your Downloads folder by default, unless you change that folder location.
5. A MySQIF™ icon will be placed on your Desktop.
6. Click the MySQIF™ icon to launch the app.
7. Enter your USERNAME and PASSWORD.
8. You’re ready to send a MySQIF™-encrypted file to a Recipient.

Answer. 

1. Just a few. Let’s assume that both Sender and Receiver are signed up.
2. Step 1: Enter a person’s name and their email address, and point to the file on your device that you want to send. Click Invite.
3. Step 2: The prospective Recipient clicks YES, send me the file.
4. Step 3: The Sender clicks SEND.
5. Step 4: The Recipient clicks DECRYPT.
6. That’s it!

Answer. 

1. No. It only ever exists for a split second on the Sender’s device while encrypting, and the Recipient’s device while decrypting.
2. Then, the one-time MySQIF™ master key disappears.

Answer. Your privacy is a God-given right. No government or corporation has the right to take it away from you. However, privacy is like a muscle. You must use and exercise it to keep it strong and able to serve you. If you fail to protect your privacy, tyrants and bullies are always more than willing to control you. Violation of privacy rights was one of the chief complaints of America's Founding Fathers against British King George III. He was ordering his troops to search colonist property and seize whatever they liked without notice and without a warrant. Use it, or lose it.

Answer. 

1. Tyrants use “fishing expeditions” to try and entrap citizens. Fine, you don’t have anything to hide, you think. However, tyrants and their scumbag attorneys use the results of unwarranted searches and seizures to fabricate evidence against you. For example, you have an unsolicited email from a child pornographer that you never even opened and you did not know it was there. To unscrupulous lawyers, that is enough probable cause to arrest you, get a warrant, search your home again, place more incriminating evidence on your computer, and get you locked up. This would not have happened had the authorities respected your privacy at the outset.
2. The famous statement attributed to Lavrentiy Beria, Stalin’s secret police chief was “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime,” is the paradigmatic example of what the rule of law is not. Without privacy, tyrants will fabricate your "crimes" from your own information, however innocent or innocuous you think it is.

Answer. The keys used are one-time for a single encryption. They are first divided into shards whose number varies with each encryption. In other words, no two sets of shards are the same and there is no pattern for a predator to detect. Without detectable patterns, polymorphic ciphers are much more difficult to decrypt by brute force. For more, read Modeling Polymorphic Ciphers by Carlson, Dutta, Ghosh, and Totaro.

Answer. Yes. Brute force is the technique a predator must use to break an encrypted file. That methodology is essentially trial and error. Try this. See what happens. Try that. See what happens. This continues into the millions or billions of times until each potent key combination is tried. It’s like having a wad of keys to unlock a door, but not knowing until you try them one at a time until you find the right key. The number of password possibilities with the current “gold standard”, AES-256 is 10300. For MySQIF™ that number is 101500. The difference here astronomical. It’s like the different between a pencil dot for AES and the Milky Way for MySQIF™. The number of possible keys would take three lifetimes of the universe to work through with MySQIF™.

Answer. 

1. Correct, you are an unknowing accomplice in the enjoyment of stolen property. Now that you know that, you have a moral and legal responsibility. Even young children understand the fundamental unfairness here. We asked an eight year old for his iPhone. We proposed to them we’d give it back with all the apps removed so they could just use the phone for voice calls because the inventor of those apps, Leader Technologies, had never been compensated for a license to use their invention for which they had invested $20 million to invent. We asked him if he thought that was fair? He responded, No! That is not fair! They should be paid. He thought for a minute and said, I don’t have any money to pay Leader, but my Dad does! OK Dad, it's time to set a moral example to your son.
2. Possession and enjoyment of stolen property is a felony if you know it is stolen. If you did not know it is stolen, as in the case with most users of social networking, you may get a pass. But, once you know it was stolen, you may be liable for your past free use of that property.
3. Leader has created a way out of this moral quagmire that was created by government and corporate thieves. It is an elegant and simple solution where you get a two-fer. The most advanced privacy encryption on the market, and a fully paid up personal license to use social networking on all your devices and platforms legally. This is all for the cost of a cheap Netflix subscription (another infringer).

Answer. 

• No, unless you want to.
• The proof is in the pudding.
• If you read to us the contents of the Crack-it! file, and tell us how you did it, and verify your work in writing, that is proof enough that you are legitimate. No further validation is necessary.

Answer. Your MySQIF™ Activity Board will have a link to your Leader license that you can download.

Answer. 

1. Currently, no.
2. Part of the magic of MySQIF™ is in the exchange of two unique half-key “fingerprints” from the Sender and Receiver’s devices. Those two keys are used to make a third master key that is used to encrypt the file on the Sender’s side, and decrypt the file on the Receiver’s side.
3. This process requires two physical devices.
4. Later, we may develop a group list function, but the fundamental need to have each Recipient respond back with their unique half key will not change.

Answer. 

1. Honestly, it is mostly a ruse. That is putting it nicely. It is really a deception, a lie, a confidence trick whereby those in power exploit it for greed and power.
2. Lots of nice-sounding words and phrases are used to describe computer security. Those words include trust, secure, private, safe, locked, shut, closed, sealed, impenetrable, assurance, certitude, protected, reliable, assure, ensure.
3. However, the British and U.S. governments and their ultra-secret “Five Eyes” “special relationship” went all out to place universal back doors in encryption in the early 1990's after Rhodes Scholar drop out groom Bill Clinton came to power. They also set out to create a public key infrastructure (PKI/PKE) that would be a toll booth on the Internet to pay them handsomely in retirement. Whenever you see https:// think British and U.S. Pilgrims Society grifter.
4. With backdoors to read everything in the Internet of Things, nothing is secure, safe or trusted. Nothing.
5. So why haven’t more computer and mathematics professionals spoken up about this confidence trick? Because they are one or more: a participant in the grift, paid off, threatened, or lack the courage. It is well known that cryptologist Phil Zimmerman stood up to the bullying and refused to put the Dual_EC_DRBG algorithm in Pretty Good Privacy.
6. MySQIF™’s mathematicians have been similarly bullied and have resisted the pressure to violate citizen trust for the sake of “national security.”
7. National security is a euphemism for a penchant for greed and power.
8. Moral mathematics and computing. Now that is a refreshing thought.
9. MySQIF™ is committed to supporting your moral rights in the Bill of Rights.

Dr. Carlson says, "I am often asked about the difference between MySQIF™ encryption and a VPN (Virtual Private Network). A VPN uses one of several encryption protocols like IPSEC, TLS, or SSL (The "https://" on your browser address line). All of these protocols are well known to be broken. One might think that double or triple encryption using these protocols might make a data stream more secure. It does not, it merely changes the point of vulnerability. Three cracked eggs are still cracked."

Dr. Carlson concludes, "Remarkably, VPN vendors are in no hurry to fix their vulnerabilities. The logical question is why? Once a predator knows the VPN vendor, the data packet routes are set and don't change, so tapping into a data stream needs only one cooperating server running a Cisco router in the stream to intercept, crack and read the data. Sadly, Cisco enables this immoral behavior. Current VPNs are little more than honeypots for predators, in my opinion."

"MySQIF™'s polymorphic mathematics makes the data contents infintely more unbreakable, and certainly unbreakable in many lifetimes."

Answer. We support Microsoft Windows